While this may be a hard pill for you to swallow, you have to open your mind to the possibility that it is actually true.
Let's put our biases aside and really dive into the two films, and what Tom Holland has to say about it.
While this may be a hard pill for you to swallow, you have to open your mind to the possibility that it is actually true.
Let's put our biases aside and really dive into the two films, and what Tom Holland has to say about it.
Well, so much for subjectivity.
There are some people out there (also known as philistines) who prefer the Marvel universe's version of Spider-Man, rather than the holy gift given to us by the gods that are the two Raimi films.
(We Orthodox Raimians acknowledge that the third film happened, but don't consider it a holy gift).
Which probably makes sense, considering he is the MCU's Spider-Man, he'd probably like himself better than Toby Maguire.
Then again, did Vince Vaughn prefer himself over Anthony Perkins? They both played Norman Bates.
He was faced with this question on Quora:
Why is Tom Holland's Spider-Man shown to be weaker, naive and foolish compared to Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man?
He went on to say: "It gives me more room to grow. If you start out a badass, there's nowhere to go. I don't know."
He's got a point, I guess. You win this round, Holland.